Cayman Islands vs Rwanda: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Cayman Islands
0.6045 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Rwanda
0.6255 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Cayman Islands rank
57th
Rwanda rank
56th

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Cayman Islands
  • Rwanda
-1-0.500.511.5199620102024

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.6255 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6045 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Cayman Islands, a difference of 0.021 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Cayman Islands ahead.

Cayman Islands ranks 57th and Rwanda ranks 56th of 204 countries.

Cayman Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cayman Islands Rwanda Difference Ahead
1990s 1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.8048 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 2.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Cayman Islands
2000s 1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3527 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.57 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Cayman Islands
2010s 0.892 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4392 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4528 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Cayman Islands
2020s 0.6046 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5635 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0412 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Cayman Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Cayman Islands or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 0.6255 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6045 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Cayman Islands as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Cayman Islands and Rwanda?
0.021 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cayman Islands and Rwanda?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Cayman Islands and Rwanda rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Cayman Islands ranks 57th and Rwanda ranks 56th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cayman Islands vs Rwanda: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/cayman-islands/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/cayman-islands/rwanda/">Cayman Islands vs Rwanda: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.