Brazil vs Tonga: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time
- Brazil
- Tonga
How they compare
Tonga currently reports -0.3992 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.4089 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Brazil, a difference of 0.0097 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Tonga ahead.
Brazil ranks 124th and Tonga ranks 123rd of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Tonga in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.1641 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8133 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6492 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Brazil |
| 2010s | -0.2081 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3435 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1354 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Brazil |
| 2020s | -0.4117 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4031 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0086 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Brazil or Tonga?
- Tonga, at -0.3992 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.4089 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Brazil as of 2024.
- What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Brazil and Tonga?
- 0.0097 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Tonga?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Tonga rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
- Brazil ranks 124th and Tonga ranks 123rd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.