Brazil vs Sri Lanka: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Brazil
-0.4089 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Sri Lanka
-0.3848 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Brazil rank
124th
Sri Lanka rank
122nd

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Brazil
  • Sri Lanka
-0.4-0.2-00.2199620102024

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports -0.3848 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.4089 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Brazil, a difference of 0.0241 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 124th and Sri Lanka ranks 122nd of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 3 and Sri Lanka in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1436 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0902 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0534 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Brazil
2000s -0.0803 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1745 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0943 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Brazil
2010s -0.2081 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.2846 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0765 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Brazil
2020s -0.4117 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3475 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0642 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Brazil or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at -0.3848 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.4089 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Brazil as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Brazil and Sri Lanka?
0.0241 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Sri Lanka?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Brazil and Sri Lanka rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Brazil ranks 124th and Sri Lanka ranks 122nd of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Sri Lanka: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/brazil/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/brazil/sri-lanka/">Brazil vs Sri Lanka: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.