Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Thailand: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Bosnia and Herzegovina
-0.5129 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Thailand
-0.5273 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
130th
Thailand rank
132nd

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Thailand
-0.6-0.4-0.2199620102024

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports -0.5129 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5273 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Thailand, a difference of 0.0144 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Thailand ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 130th and Thailand ranks 132nd of 205 countries.

Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Thailand Difference Ahead
1990s -0.5065 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1503 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3562 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Thailand
2000s -0.4276 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3515 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0761 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Thailand
2010s -0.4865 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3542 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1324 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Thailand
2020s -0.617 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.4284 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1886 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Thailand?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at -0.5129 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5273 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Thailand as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Thailand?
0.0144 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Thailand?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Thailand rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 130th and Thailand ranks 132nd of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Thailand: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/bosnia-and-herzegovina/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/bosnia-and-herzegovina/thailand/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Thailand: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
205 places, 5,191 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.