Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Indonesia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Bosnia and Herzegovina
-0.5129 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Indonesia
-0.5446 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
130th
Indonesia rank
133rd

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Indonesia
-1.2-1-0.75-0.5-0.25199620102024

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports -0.5129 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5446 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Indonesia, a difference of 0.0317 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 130th and Indonesia ranks 133rd of 205 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 3 and Indonesia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Indonesia Difference Ahead
1990s -0.5065 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5244 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s -0.4276 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.9661 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5385 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s -0.4865 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.5672 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0806 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s -0.617 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.424 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.193 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Indonesia?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at -0.5129 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5446 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Indonesia as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Indonesia?
0.0317 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Indonesia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Indonesia rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 130th and Indonesia ranks 133rd of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Indonesia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/bosnia-and-herzegovina/indonesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/bosnia-and-herzegovina/indonesia/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Indonesia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
205 places, 5,191 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.