Bolivia vs Madagascar: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time
- Bolivia
- Madagascar
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports -0.9976 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Madagascar, a difference of 0.0124 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Madagascar ahead.
Bolivia ranks 164th and Madagascar ranks 165th of 204 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 2 and Madagascar in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.4843 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0083 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4761 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Madagascar |
| 2000s | -0.6165 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1559 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4606 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Madagascar |
| 2010s | -0.6909 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.725 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.034 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Bolivia |
| 2020s | -0.9378 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.951 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0132 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Bolivia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Bolivia or Madagascar?
- Bolivia, at -0.9976 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Madagascar as of 2024.
- What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Bolivia and Madagascar?
- 0.0124 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Madagascar?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Bolivia and Madagascar rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
- Bolivia ranks 164th and Madagascar ranks 165th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.