Benin vs Kosovo: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time
- Benin
- Kosovo
How they compare
Benin currently reports -0.2407 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.2547 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kosovo, a difference of 0.014 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Kosovo ahead.
Benin ranks 103rd and Kosovo ranks 106th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Benin averaged higher in 1 and Kosovo in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | Kosovo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.5894 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1176 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4717 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kosovo |
| 2010s | -0.4729 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3971 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0758 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kosovo |
| 2020s | -0.1312 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3027 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1715 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Benin |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Benin or Kosovo?
- Benin, at -0.2407 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.2547 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kosovo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Benin and Kosovo?
- 0.014 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Benin ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Kosovo?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Benin and Kosovo rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
- Benin ranks 103rd and Kosovo ranks 106th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.