Benin vs French Polynesia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Benin
- French Polynesia
How they compare
French Polynesia currently reports -0.1973 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.2113 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Benin, a difference of 0.014 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2021 it was Benin ahead.
Benin ranks 105th and French Polynesia ranks 103rd of 208 countries.
Benin has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Benin or French Polynesia?
- French Polynesia, at -0.1973 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.2113 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Benin as of 2025.
- What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Benin and French Polynesia?
- 0.014 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with French Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and French Polynesia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2021 to 2025.
- How do Benin and French Polynesia rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
- Benin ranks 105th and French Polynesia ranks 103rd of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.