Belarus vs Palestine: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Belarus
-0.5781 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Palestine
-0.5708 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Belarus rank
139th
Palestine rank
136th

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Belarus
  • Palestine
-0.6-0.4-0.2-0199620102024

How they compare

Palestine currently reports -0.5708 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5781 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Belarus, a difference of 0.0073 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Palestine ahead.

Belarus ranks 139th and Palestine ranks 136th of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Palestine in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Palestine Difference Ahead
1990s -0.2746 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3512 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0766 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Belarus
2000s -0.4423 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.2583 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.184 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Palestine
2010s -0.2371 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3347 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0976 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Belarus
2020s -0.367 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.574 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2069 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Belarus or Palestine?
Palestine, at -0.5708 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5781 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Belarus as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Belarus and Palestine?
0.0073 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Palestine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Palestine?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Belarus and Palestine rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Belarus ranks 139th and Palestine ranks 136th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Palestine: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/belarus/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/belarus/west-bank-and-gaza/">Belarus vs Palestine: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.