Belarus vs Philippines: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Belarus
-0.5723 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Philippines
-0.5735 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Belarus rank
140th
Philippines rank
141st

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Belarus
  • Philippines
-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2-0199620102025

How they compare

Belarus currently reports -0.5723 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5735 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Philippines, a difference of 0.0012 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Philippines ahead.

Belarus ranks 140th and Philippines ranks 141st of 208 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Philippines Difference Ahead
1990s -0.2735 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3115 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.038 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Belarus
2000s -0.4282 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6949 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2667 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Belarus
2010s -0.2418 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.615 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3732 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Belarus
2020s -0.4028 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.567 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1642 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Belarus or Philippines?
Belarus, at -0.5723 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5735 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Philippines as of 2025.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Belarus and Philippines?
0.0012 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Philippines?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Belarus and Philippines rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Belarus ranks 140th and Philippines ranks 141st of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Philippines: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 15 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/belarus/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/belarus/philippines/">Belarus vs Philippines: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,432 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.