Bangladesh vs Kyrgyzstan: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Bangladesh
-1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Kyrgyzstan
-1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Bangladesh rank
171st
Kyrgyzstan rank
174th

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Kyrgyzstan
-1.6-1.4-1.2-1-0.8199620102024

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports -1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 171st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 174th of 205 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 2 and Kyrgyzstan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Kyrgyzstan Difference Ahead
1990s -0.8727 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.8222 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0505 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Kyrgyzstan
2000s -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.063 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Kyrgyzstan
2010s -1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0525 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Bangladesh
2020s -1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0188 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Bangladesh or Kyrgyzstan?
Bangladesh, at -1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Bangladesh and Kyrgyzstan?
0.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Kyrgyzstan?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Bangladesh and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Bangladesh ranks 171st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 174th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Kyrgyzstan: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/bangladesh/kyrgyz-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/bangladesh/kyrgyz-republic/">Bangladesh vs Kyrgyzstan: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
205 places, 5,191 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.