Bahamas vs France: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Bahamas
1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
France
1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Bahamas rank
26th
France rank
29th

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Bahamas
  • France
00.511.5199620102024

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports 1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in France, a difference of 0.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was France ahead.

Bahamas ranks 26th and France ranks 29th of 204 countries.

France has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas France Difference Ahead
1990s 1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0605 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 France
2000s 1.32 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.38 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0588 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 France
2010s 1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.38 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0953 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 France
2020s 1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.32 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0923 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 France

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Bahamas or France?
Bahamas, at 1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in France as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Bahamas and France?
0.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and France?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Bahamas and France rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Bahamas ranks 26th and France ranks 29th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs France: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/bahamas-the/france/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/bahamas-the/france/">Bahamas vs France: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.