Azerbaijan vs Papua New Guinea: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Azerbaijan
-0.7751 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
-0.7974 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Azerbaijan rank
150th
Papua New Guinea rank
153rd

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Papua New Guinea
-1.5-1.2-1-0.75-0.5-0.25199620102024

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports -0.7751 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7974 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.0223 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 150th and Papua New Guinea ranks 153rd of 204 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s -1.39 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3468 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Papua New Guinea
2000s -1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.9966 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2329 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Papua New Guinea
2010s -0.9904 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.981 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0094 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Papua New Guinea
2020s -0.8046 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6385 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.166 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Azerbaijan or Papua New Guinea?
Azerbaijan, at -0.7751 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7974 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Azerbaijan and Papua New Guinea?
0.0223 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Papua New Guinea?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Azerbaijan and Papua New Guinea rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Azerbaijan ranks 150th and Papua New Guinea ranks 153rd of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan vs Papua New Guinea: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/azerbaijan/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/azerbaijan/papua-new-guinea/">Azerbaijan vs Papua New Guinea: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.