Azerbaijan vs Eswatini: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Azerbaijan
-0.7751 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Eswatini
-0.7852 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Azerbaijan rank
150th
Eswatini rank
152nd

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Eswatini
-1.5-1-0.50199620102024

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports -0.7751 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7852 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0101 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Eswatini ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 150th and Eswatini ranks 152nd of 204 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Eswatini Difference Ahead
1990s -1.39 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0199 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.41 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Eswatini
2000s -1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.025 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Eswatini
2010s -0.9904 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1964 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.794 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Eswatini
2020s -0.8046 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.581 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2236 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Azerbaijan or Eswatini?
Azerbaijan, at -0.7751 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7852 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Eswatini as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Azerbaijan and Eswatini?
0.0101 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Eswatini?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Azerbaijan and Eswatini rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Azerbaijan ranks 150th and Eswatini ranks 152nd of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan vs Eswatini: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/azerbaijan/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/azerbaijan/eswatini/">Azerbaijan vs Eswatini: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.