Azerbaijan, Republic of vs Ecuador: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Azerbaijan, Republic of
-0.7751 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Ecuador
-0.7757 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Azerbaijan, Republic of rank
150th
Ecuador rank
151st

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Azerbaijan, Republic of
  • Ecuador
-1.4-1.2-1-0.8-0.6199620102024

How they compare

Azerbaijan, Republic of currently reports -0.7751 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7757 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0006 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Ecuador ahead.

Azerbaijan, Republic of ranks 150th and Ecuador ranks 151st of 204 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan, Republic of Ecuador Difference Ahead
1990s -1.39 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6241 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7707 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Ecuador
2000s -1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.7634 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4662 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Ecuador
2010s -0.9904 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6745 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3159 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Ecuador
2020s -0.8046 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6604 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1442 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Azerbaijan, Republic of or Ecuador?
Azerbaijan, Republic of, at -0.7751 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7757 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Ecuador as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Azerbaijan, Republic of and Ecuador?
0.0006 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Azerbaijan, Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan, Republic of and Ecuador?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Azerbaijan, Republic of and Ecuador rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Azerbaijan, Republic of ranks 150th and Ecuador ranks 151st of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan, Republic of vs Ecuador: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/azerbaijan/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/azerbaijan/ecuador/">Azerbaijan, Republic of vs Ecuador: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.