Austria vs Japan: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Austria
1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Japan
1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Austria rank
25th
Japan rank
24th

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Austria
  • Japan
0.511.52199620102024

How they compare

Japan currently reports 1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Austria, a difference of 0.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Austria ahead.

Austria ranks 25th and Japan ranks 24th of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 3 and Japan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Japan Difference Ahead
1990s 1.85 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9404 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9084 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Austria
2000s 1.89 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9288 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9589 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Austria
2010s 1.53 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.47 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0652 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Austria
2020s 1.39 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0148 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Austria or Japan?
Japan, at 1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Austria as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Austria and Japan?
0.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Japan?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Austria and Japan rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Austria ranks 25th and Japan ranks 24th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Japan: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/austria/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/austria/japan/">Austria vs Japan: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.