Aruba vs Lithuania: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time
- Aruba
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0.9928 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8688 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Aruba, a difference of 0.124 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times Aruba's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 41st and Lithuania ranks 38th of 204 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.317 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9031 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Aruba |
| 2010s | 1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5959 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4869 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Aruba |
| 2020s | 0.928 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9085 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0195 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Aruba or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 0.9928 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8688 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Aruba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Aruba and Lithuania?
- 0.124 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Lithuania?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Lithuania rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
- Aruba ranks 41st and Lithuania ranks 38th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.