Aruba vs Israel: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time
- Aruba
- Israel
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0.8688 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8533 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Israel, a difference of 0.0155 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 41st and Israel ranks 42nd of 204 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.754 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4661 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Aruba |
| 2010s | 1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7964 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2864 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Aruba |
| 2020s | 0.928 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8461 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0819 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Aruba or Israel?
- Aruba, at 0.8688 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8533 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Israel as of 2024.
- What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Aruba and Israel?
- 0.0155 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Israel?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Israel rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
- Aruba ranks 41st and Israel ranks 42nd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.