Albania vs Tonga: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time
- Albania
- Tonga
How they compare
Tonga currently reports -0.3992 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.4208 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Albania, a difference of 0.0216 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Tonga ahead.
Albania ranks 125th and Tonga ranks 123rd of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Albania averaged higher in 1 and Tonga in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.7044 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8133 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1088 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Albania |
| 2010s | -0.6292 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3435 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2858 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Tonga |
| 2020s | -0.5293 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4031 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1263 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Albania or Tonga?
- Tonga, at -0.3992 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.4208 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Albania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Albania and Tonga?
- 0.0216 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Tonga?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Albania and Tonga rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
- Albania ranks 125th and Tonga ranks 123rd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.