Albania vs Mongolia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Albania
-0.4208 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Mongolia
-0.486 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Albania rank
125th
Mongolia rank
128th

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Albania
  • Mongolia
-1-0.50199620102024

How they compare

Albania currently reports -0.4208 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.486 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mongolia, a difference of 0.0652 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mongolia ahead.

Albania ranks 125th and Mongolia ranks 128th of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Albania averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Albania Mongolia Difference Ahead
1990s -0.7004 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2471 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9475 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mongolia
2000s -0.802 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.4452 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3568 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mongolia
2010s -0.6292 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.5854 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0438 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mongolia
2020s -0.5293 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6104 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0811 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Albania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Albania or Mongolia?
Albania, at -0.4208 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.486 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mongolia as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Albania and Mongolia?
0.0652 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Albania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Mongolia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Albania and Mongolia rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Albania ranks 125th and Mongolia ranks 128th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Albania vs Mongolia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/albania/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/albania/mongolia/">Albania vs Mongolia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.