Madagascar vs South Sudan: Contributions global temp change, per unit of GDP
Madagascar
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2024
South Sudan
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2015
Madagascar rank
2nd
South Sudan rank
3rd
Contributions global temp change, per unit of GDP over time
- Madagascar
- South Sudan
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in South Sudan, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Madagascar has been ahead every year.
Madagascar ranks 2nd and South Sudan ranks 3rd of 202 countries.
Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher contributions global temp change, per unit of gdp, Madagascar or South Sudan?
- Madagascar, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in contributions global temp change, per unit of gdp between Madagascar and South Sudan?
- 0 units per US$ of GDP, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2015.
- How do Madagascar and South Sudan rank globally for contributions global temp change, per unit of gdp?
- Madagascar ranks 2nd and South Sudan ranks 3rd of 202 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Contributions global temp change, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Contributions global temp change divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.