Australia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Contributions global temp change, per square kilometre

Australia
0 units per square kilometre
in 2024
Turks and Caicos Islands
0 units per square kilometre
in 2024
Australia rank
180th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
178th

Contributions global temp change, per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
000000196119922024

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.2 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 180th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 178th of 204 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 6 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Australia
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Australia
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Australia
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Australia
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Australia
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Australia
2020s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher contributions global temp change, per square kilometre, Australia or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Australia as of 2024.
What is the difference in contributions global temp change, per square kilometre between Australia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0 units per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Australia and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for contributions global temp change, per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 180th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 178th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Contributions global temp change, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Contributions global temp change, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/contributions-global-temp-change-per-square-kilometre/australia/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/contributions-global-temp-change-per-square-kilometre/australia/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Australia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Contributions global temp change, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Contributions global temp change, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 11,878 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Contributions global temp change divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.