Panama vs Papua New Guinea: Constraints on the Executive Score

Panama
6
in 2018
Papua New Guinea
6
in 2018
Panama rank
64th
Papua New Guinea rank
64th

Constraints on the Executive Score over time

  • Panama
  • Papua New Guinea
123456190319602018

How they compare

Panama currently reports 6 against 6 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Panama ranks 64th and Papua New Guinea ranks 64th of 166 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 3 and Papua New Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1970s 1.4 5 3.6 Papua New Guinea
1980s 2.6 5 2.4 Papua New Guinea
1990s 6 5 1 Panama
2000s 6 5 1 Panama
2010s 6 5.78 0.2222 Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher constraints on the executive score, Panama or Papua New Guinea?
Panama, at 6 against 6 in Papua New Guinea as of 2018.
What is the difference in constraints on the executive score between Panama and Papua New Guinea?
0, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Papua New Guinea?
44 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2018.
How do Panama and Papua New Guinea rank globally for constraints on the executive score?
Panama ranks 64th and Papua New Guinea ranks 64th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Constraints on the Executive Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Constraints on the Executive Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which the executive is constrained. It ranges from unconstrained executives (score of 1), over slight or moderate constraints (score of 3), and substantial constraints (score of 5), to an executive that is subordinated to or on par with other authorities (score of 7). The remaining categories are intermediate ones.