Mauritius vs New Zealand: Constraints on the Executive Score
Mauritius
7
in 2018
New Zealand
7
in 2018
Mauritius rank
1st
New Zealand rank
1st
Constraints on the Executive Score over time
- Mauritius
- New Zealand
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 7 against 7 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.
Across all 51 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 7 | 7 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 7 | 7 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 7 | 7 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 7 | 7 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 7 | 7 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 7 | 7 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher constraints on the executive score, Mauritius or New Zealand?
- Mauritius, at 7 against 7 in New Zealand as of 2018.
- What is the difference in constraints on the executive score between Mauritius and New Zealand?
- 0, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and New Zealand?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2018.
- How do Mauritius and New Zealand rank globally for constraints on the executive score?
- Mauritius ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Constraints on the Executive Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which the executive is constrained. It ranges from unconstrained executives (score of 1), over slight or moderate constraints (score of 3), and substantial constraints (score of 5), to an executive that is subordinated to or on par with other authorities (score of 7). The remaining categories are intermediate ones.