Latvia vs Montenegro: Constraints on the Executive Score

Latvia
7
in 2018
Montenegro
7
in 2018
Latvia rank
1st
Montenegro rank
1st

Constraints on the Executive Score over time

  • Latvia
  • Montenegro
02468192019692018

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 7 against 7 in Montenegro, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 90 shared years of data; in 1921 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 1st and Montenegro ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Across the 10 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 4 and Montenegro in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Montenegro Difference Ahead
1920s 7 4.56 2.44 Latvia
1930s 4 1.5 2.5 Latvia
1940s 1 3.33 2.33 Montenegro
1950s 2.75 3 0.25 Montenegro
1960s 3 3 0
1970s 3 3 0
1980s 3.1 4 0.9 Montenegro
1990s 6.7 2 4.7 Latvia
2000s 7 6.4 0.6 Latvia
2010s 7 7 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher constraints on the executive score, Latvia or Montenegro?
Latvia, at 7 against 7 in Montenegro as of 2018.
What is the difference in constraints on the executive score between Latvia and Montenegro?
0, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Montenegro?
90 years are reported by both, from 1921 to 2018.
How do Latvia and Montenegro rank globally for constraints on the executive score?
Latvia ranks 1st and Montenegro ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Constraints on the Executive Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Constraints on the Executive Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which the executive is constrained. It ranges from unconstrained executives (score of 1), over slight or moderate constraints (score of 3), and substantial constraints (score of 5), to an executive that is subordinated to or on par with other authorities (score of 7). The remaining categories are intermediate ones.