Kazakhstan vs Mauritania: Constraints on the Executive Score

Kazakhstan
2
in 2018
Mauritania
2
in 2018
Kazakhstan rank
145th
Mauritania rank
145th

Constraints on the Executive Score over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Mauritania
12345180019092018

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 2 against 2 in Mauritania, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Mauritania ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 145th and Mauritania ranks 145th of 166 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Mauritania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 3 3.4 0.4 Mauritania
1970s 3 3 0
1980s 3.1 3 0.1 Kazakhstan
1990s 2.1 3 0.9 Mauritania
2000s 1.5 3 1.5 Mauritania
2010s 2 2 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher constraints on the executive score, Kazakhstan or Mauritania?
Kazakhstan, at 2 against 2 in Mauritania as of 2018.
What is the difference in constraints on the executive score between Kazakhstan and Mauritania?
0, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Mauritania?
59 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2018.
How do Kazakhstan and Mauritania rank globally for constraints on the executive score?
Kazakhstan ranks 145th and Mauritania ranks 145th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Constraints on the Executive Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Constraints on the Executive Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which the executive is constrained. It ranges from unconstrained executives (score of 1), over slight or moderate constraints (score of 3), and substantial constraints (score of 5), to an executive that is subordinated to or on par with other authorities (score of 7). The remaining categories are intermediate ones.