Japan vs Luxembourg: Constraints on the Executive Score

Japan
7
in 2018
Luxembourg
7
in 2018
Japan rank
1st
Luxembourg rank
1st

Constraints on the Executive Score over time

  • Japan
  • Luxembourg
02468180019092018

How they compare

Japan currently reports 7 against 7 in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 139 shared years of data; in 1868 it was Japan ahead.

Japan ranks 1st and Luxembourg ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 15 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Luxembourg Difference Ahead
1860s 7 5 2 Japan
1870s 7 5 2 Japan
1880s 7 5 2 Japan
1890s 7 6 1 Japan
1900s 7 6 1 Japan
1910s 7 6 1 Japan
1920s 7 7 0 β€”
1930s 7 7 0 β€”
1950s 7 7 0 β€”
1960s 7 7 0 β€”
1970s 7 7 0 β€”
1980s 7 7 0 β€”
1990s 7 7 0 β€”
2000s 7 7 0 β€”
2010s 7 7 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher constraints on the executive score, Japan or Luxembourg?
Japan, at 7 against 7 in Luxembourg as of 2018.
What is the difference in constraints on the executive score between Japan and Luxembourg?
0, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Luxembourg?
139 years are reported by both, from 1868 to 2018.
How do Japan and Luxembourg rank globally for constraints on the executive score?
Japan ranks 1st and Luxembourg ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Constraints on the Executive Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Constraints on the Executive Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which the executive is constrained. It ranges from unconstrained executives (score of 1), over slight or moderate constraints (score of 3), and substantial constraints (score of 5), to an executive that is subordinated to or on par with other authorities (score of 7). The remaining categories are intermediate ones.