Guinea-Bissau vs Madagascar: Constraints on the Executive Score

Guinea-Bissau
6
in 2018
Madagascar
6
in 2018
Guinea-Bissau rank
64th
Madagascar rank
64th

Constraints on the Executive Score over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Madagascar
02468196019892018

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 6 against 6 in Madagascar, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Madagascar ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 64th and Madagascar ranks 64th of 166 countries.

Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Madagascar Difference Ahead
1970s 3 3 0
1980s 1.6 3 1.4 Madagascar
1990s 3.43 6.43 3 Madagascar
2000s 4.9 5 0.1 Madagascar
2010s 5.56 5.56 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher constraints on the executive score, Guinea-Bissau or Madagascar?
Guinea-Bissau, at 6 against 6 in Madagascar as of 2018.
What is the difference in constraints on the executive score between Guinea-Bissau and Madagascar?
0, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Madagascar?
42 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2018.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Madagascar rank globally for constraints on the executive score?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 64th and Madagascar ranks 64th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Constraints on the Executive Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Constraints on the Executive Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which the executive is constrained. It ranges from unconstrained executives (score of 1), over slight or moderate constraints (score of 3), and substantial constraints (score of 5), to an executive that is subordinated to or on par with other authorities (score of 7). The remaining categories are intermediate ones.