Georgia vs Malawi: Constraints on the Executive Score
Georgia
6
in 2018
Malawi
6
in 2018
Georgia rank
64th
Malawi rank
64th
Constraints on the Executive Score over time
- Georgia
- Malawi
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 6 against 6 in Malawi, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 64th and Malawi ranks 64th of 167 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 4 and Malawi in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3 | 1 | 2 | Georgia |
| 1970s | 3 | 1 | 2 | Georgia |
| 1980s | 3.1 | 1 | 2.1 | Georgia |
| 1990s | 4.71 | 3.86 | 0.8571 | Georgia |
| 2000s | 5 | 5.4 | 0.4 | Malawi |
| 2010s | 5.67 | 6 | 0.3333 | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher constraints on the executive score, Georgia or Malawi?
- Georgia, at 6 against 6 in Malawi as of 2018.
- What is the difference in constraints on the executive score between Georgia and Malawi?
- 0, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Malawi?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2018.
- How do Georgia and Malawi rank globally for constraints on the executive score?
- Georgia ranks 64th and Malawi ranks 64th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Constraints on the Executive Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which the executive is constrained. It ranges from unconstrained executives (score of 1), over slight or moderate constraints (score of 3), and substantial constraints (score of 5), to an executive that is subordinated to or on par with other authorities (score of 7). The remaining categories are intermediate ones.