Equatorial Guinea vs Saudi Arabia: Constraints on the Executive Score
Equatorial Guinea
1
in 2018
Saudi Arabia
1
in 2018
Equatorial Guinea rank
157th
Saudi Arabia rank
157th
Constraints on the Executive Score over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 1 against 1 in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 157th and Saudi Arabia ranks 157th of 166 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2 | 1 | 1 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1.3 | 1 | 0.3 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher constraints on the executive score, Equatorial Guinea or Saudi Arabia?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 1 against 1 in Saudi Arabia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in constraints on the executive score between Equatorial Guinea and Saudi Arabia?
- 0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Saudi Arabia?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2018.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Saudi Arabia rank globally for constraints on the executive score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 157th and Saudi Arabia ranks 157th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Constraints on the Executive Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which the executive is constrained. It ranges from unconstrained executives (score of 1), over slight or moderate constraints (score of 3), and substantial constraints (score of 5), to an executive that is subordinated to or on par with other authorities (score of 7). The remaining categories are intermediate ones.