El Salvador vs Panama: Constraints on the Executive Score

El Salvador
6
in 2018
Panama
6
in 2018
El Salvador rank
64th
Panama rank
64th

Constraints on the Executive Score over time

  • El Salvador
  • Panama
123456184119292018

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 6 against 6 in Panama, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 109 shared years of data; in 1903 it was Panama ahead.

El Salvador ranks 64th and Panama ranks 64th of 166 countries.

Across the 12 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 2 and Panama in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Panama Difference Ahead
1900s 3 3 0 β€”
1910s 3 3 0 β€”
1920s 3 3 0 β€”
1930s 1.2 3 1.8 Panama
1940s 1 3 2 Panama
1950s 3 4.5 1.5 Panama
1960s 3 4.2 1.2 Panama
1970s 3 1.11 1.89 El Salvador
1980s 5 2.67 2.33 El Salvador
1990s 5 6 1 Panama
2000s 5.1 6 0.9 Panama
2010s 6 6 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher constraints on the executive score, El Salvador or Panama?
El Salvador, at 6 against 6 in Panama as of 2018.
What is the difference in constraints on the executive score between El Salvador and Panama?
0, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Panama?
109 years are reported by both, from 1903 to 2018.
How do El Salvador and Panama rank globally for constraints on the executive score?
El Salvador ranks 64th and Panama ranks 64th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Constraints on the Executive Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Constraints on the Executive Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which the executive is constrained. It ranges from unconstrained executives (score of 1), over slight or moderate constraints (score of 3), and substantial constraints (score of 5), to an executive that is subordinated to or on par with other authorities (score of 7). The remaining categories are intermediate ones.