Chile vs North Macedonia: Constraints on the Executive Score
Chile
7
in 2018
North Macedonia
7
in 2018
Chile rank
1st
North Macedonia rank
1st
Constraints on the Executive Score over time
- Chile
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Chile currently reports 7 against 7 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 89 shared years of data; in 1921 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 1st and North Macedonia ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Across the 10 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 5 and North Macedonia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 4.5 | 4.5 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 3 | 1.5 | 1.5 | Chile |
| 1940s | 3 | 3.33 | 0.3333 | North Macedonia |
| 1950s | 3.25 | 3 | 0.25 | Chile |
| 1960s | 4.6 | 3 | 1.6 | Chile |
| 1970s | 2.2 | 3 | 0.8 | North Macedonia |
| 1980s | 1.7 | 4 | 2.3 | North Macedonia |
| 1990s | 7 | 4.8 | 2.2 | Chile |
| 2000s | 7 | 6.6 | 0.4 | Chile |
| 2010s | 7 | 7 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher constraints on the executive score, Chile or North Macedonia?
- Chile, at 7 against 7 in North Macedonia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in constraints on the executive score between Chile and North Macedonia?
- 0, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and North Macedonia?
- 89 years are reported by both, from 1921 to 2018.
- How do Chile and North Macedonia rank globally for constraints on the executive score?
- Chile ranks 1st and North Macedonia ranks 1st of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Constraints on the Executive Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which the executive is constrained. It ranges from unconstrained executives (score of 1), over slight or moderate constraints (score of 3), and substantial constraints (score of 5), to an executive that is subordinated to or on par with other authorities (score of 7). The remaining categories are intermediate ones.