Central African Republic vs Latvia: Constraints on the Executive Score

Central African Republic
7
in 2018
Latvia
7
in 2018
Central African Republic rank
1st
Latvia rank
1st

Constraints on the Executive Score over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Latvia
02468192019692018

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 7 against 7 in Latvia, a difference of 0.

Across all 56 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

Central African Republic ranks 1st and Latvia ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Latvia Difference Ahead
1960s 1 3 2 Latvia
1970s 1 3 2 Latvia
1980s 1 3.1 2.1 Latvia
1990s 3.8 6.7 2.9 Latvia
2000s 3.4 7 3.6 Latvia
2010s 5 7 2 Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher constraints on the executive score, Central African Republic or Latvia?
Central African Republic, at 7 against 7 in Latvia as of 2018.
What is the difference in constraints on the executive score between Central African Republic and Latvia?
0, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Latvia?
56 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2018.
How do Central African Republic and Latvia rank globally for constraints on the executive score?
Central African Republic ranks 1st and Latvia ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Constraints on the Executive Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Constraints on the Executive Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which the executive is constrained. It ranges from unconstrained executives (score of 1), over slight or moderate constraints (score of 3), and substantial constraints (score of 5), to an executive that is subordinated to or on par with other authorities (score of 7). The remaining categories are intermediate ones.