Belgium vs Montenegro: Constraints on the Executive Score

Belgium
7
in 2018
Montenegro
7
in 2018
Belgium rank
1st
Montenegro rank
1st

Constraints on the Executive Score over time

  • Belgium
  • Montenegro
02468183119242018

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 7 against 7 in Montenegro, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 89 shared years of data; in 1921 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 1st and Montenegro ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 10 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Montenegro Difference Ahead
1920s 7 4.56 2.44 Belgium
1930s 7 1.5 5.5 Belgium
1940s 7 3 4 Belgium
1950s 7 3 4 Belgium
1960s 7 3 4 Belgium
1970s 7 3 4 Belgium
1980s 7 4 3 Belgium
1990s 7 2 5 Belgium
2000s 7 6.4 0.6 Belgium
2010s 7 7 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher constraints on the executive score, Belgium or Montenegro?
Belgium, at 7 against 7 in Montenegro as of 2018.
What is the difference in constraints on the executive score between Belgium and Montenegro?
0, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Montenegro?
89 years are reported by both, from 1921 to 2018.
How do Belgium and Montenegro rank globally for constraints on the executive score?
Belgium ranks 1st and Montenegro ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Constraints on the Executive Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Constraints on the Executive Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which the executive is constrained. It ranges from unconstrained executives (score of 1), over slight or moderate constraints (score of 3), and substantial constraints (score of 5), to an executive that is subordinated to or on par with other authorities (score of 7). The remaining categories are intermediate ones.