Australia vs Uruguay: Constraints on the Executive Score
Australia
7
in 2018
Uruguay
7
in 2018
Australia rank
1st
Uruguay rank
1st
Constraints on the Executive Score over time
- Australia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Australia currently reports 7 against 7 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 116 shared years of data; in 1901 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 7 | 2.33 | 4.67 | Australia |
| 1910s | 7 | 4.1 | 2.9 | Australia |
| 1920s | 7 | 5 | 2 | Australia |
| 1930s | 7 | 3.8 | 3.2 | Australia |
| 1940s | 7 | 3 | 4 | Australia |
| 1950s | 7 | 4.6 | 2.4 | Australia |
| 1960s | 7 | 5 | 2 | Australia |
| 1970s | 7 | 2.62 | 4.38 | Australia |
| 1980s | 7 | 5 | 2 | Australia |
| 1990s | 7 | 7 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 7 | 7 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 7 | 7 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher constraints on the executive score, Australia or Uruguay?
- Australia, at 7 against 7 in Uruguay as of 2018.
- What is the difference in constraints on the executive score between Australia and Uruguay?
- 0, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Uruguay?
- 116 years are reported by both, from 1901 to 2018.
- How do Australia and Uruguay rank globally for constraints on the executive score?
- Australia ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Constraints on the Executive Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which the executive is constrained. It ranges from unconstrained executives (score of 1), over slight or moderate constraints (score of 3), and substantial constraints (score of 5), to an executive that is subordinated to or on par with other authorities (score of 7). The remaining categories are intermediate ones.