Armenia vs Liberia: Constraints on the Executive Score

Armenia
6
in 2018
Liberia
6
in 2018
Armenia rank
64th
Liberia rank
64th

Constraints on the Executive Score over time

  • Armenia
  • Liberia
02468184719322018

How they compare

Armenia currently reports 6 against 6 in Liberia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 87 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Liberia ahead.

Armenia ranks 64th and Liberia ranks 64th of 166 countries.

Across the 10 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 3 and Liberia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Liberia Difference Ahead
1920s 2.62 3 0.375 Liberia
1930s 1.3 3 1.7 Liberia
1940s 1 3 2 Liberia
1950s 2.4 3 0.6 Liberia
1960s 3 3 0
1970s 3 3 0
1980s 3.1 1 2.1 Armenia
1990s 4.33 2 2.33 Armenia
2000s 5 4.29 0.7143 Armenia
2010s 5.11 6 0.8889 Liberia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher constraints on the executive score, Armenia or Liberia?
Armenia, at 6 against 6 in Liberia as of 2018.
What is the difference in constraints on the executive score between Armenia and Liberia?
0, with Armenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Liberia?
87 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2018.
How do Armenia and Liberia rank globally for constraints on the executive score?
Armenia ranks 64th and Liberia ranks 64th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Constraints on the Executive Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Constraints on the Executive Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which the executive is constrained. It ranges from unconstrained executives (score of 1), over slight or moderate constraints (score of 3), and substantial constraints (score of 5), to an executive that is subordinated to or on par with other authorities (score of 7). The remaining categories are intermediate ones.