Chile vs Mexico: Completion rate, primary education, adjusted location parity index

Chile
1 LPIA
in 2017
Mexico
0.9905 LPIA
in 2018
Chile rank
2nd
Mexico rank
5th

Completion rate, primary education, adjusted location parity index over time

  • Chile
  • Mexico
00.250.50.751200020092018

How they compare

Chile currently reports 1 LPIA against 0.9905 LPIA in Mexico, a difference of 0.0095 LPIA.

Chile ranks 2nd and Mexico ranks 5th of 40 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher completion rate, primary education, adjusted location parity index, Chile or Mexico?
Chile, at 1 LPIA against 0.9905 LPIA in Mexico as of 2017.
What is the difference in completion rate, primary education, adjusted location parity index between Chile and Mexico?
0.0095 LPIA, with Chile ahead.
How do Chile and Mexico rank globally for completion rate, primary education, adjusted location parity index?
Chile ranks 2nd and Mexico ranks 5th of 40 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Completion rate, primary education, adjusted location parity index (LPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Completion rate, primary education, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)
Unit
LPIA
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
40 places, 369 data points, 1996–2019
Last refreshed

The Adjusted Location Parity Index (LPIA) is calculated by dividing the rural value for the indicator by the urban value for the indicator. If the resulting value exceeds 1, the ratio is inverted and subtracted from 2. The adjusted location parity index is symmetrical around 1 and lies in the range 0-2. An adjusted LPI equal to 1 indicates parity between rural and urban locations. In general, a value less than 1 indicates disparity in favor of urban locations and a value greater than 1 indicates disparity in favor of rural locations. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute for Statistics: http://uis.unesco.org/