Uzbekistan vs Viet Nam: Competitiveness of Political Participation Score
Uzbekistan
1
in 2018
Viet Nam
1
in 2018
Uzbekistan rank
149th
Viet Nam rank
149th
Competitiveness of Political Participation Score over time
- Uzbekistan
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 1 against 1 in Viet Nam, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Uzbekistan ranks 149th and Viet Nam ranks 149th of 167 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Uzbekistan | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1.2 | 1 | 0.2 | Uzbekistan |
| 1990s | 1.1 | 1 | 0.1 | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of political participation score, Uzbekistan or Viet Nam?
- Uzbekistan, at 1 against 1 in Viet Nam as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of political participation score between Uzbekistan and Viet Nam?
- 0, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Uzbekistan and Viet Nam?
- 43 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2018.
- How do Uzbekistan and Viet Nam rank globally for competitiveness of political participation score?
- Uzbekistan ranks 149th and Viet Nam ranks 149th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is competitive. It ranges from unregulated political participation (score of 0), over repressed political participation (score of 1), suppressed political participation (score of 2), factional political participation (score of 3), and transitional arrangements (score of 4), to competitive political participation (score of 5).