Sri Lanka vs Venezuela: Competitiveness of Political Participation Score
Competitiveness of Political Participation Score over time
- Sri Lanka
- Venezuela
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 3 against 3 in Venezuela, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 71 shared years of data; in 1948 it was Venezuela ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 94th and Venezuela ranks 94th of 167 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 1 and Venezuela in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Venezuela | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 0 | 3 | 3 | Venezuela |
| 1950s | 0 | 3.2 | 3.2 | Venezuela |
| 1960s | 0 | 4.1 | 4.1 | Venezuela |
| 1970s | 3 | 5 | 2 | Venezuela |
| 1980s | 3 | 5 | 2 | Venezuela |
| 1990s | 3 | 4.2 | 1.2 | Venezuela |
| 2000s | 3.3 | 3.1 | 0.2 | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of political participation score, Sri Lanka or Venezuela?
- Sri Lanka, at 3 against 3 in Venezuela as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of political participation score between Sri Lanka and Venezuela?
- 0, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Venezuela?
- 71 years are reported by both, from 1948 to 2018.
- How do Sri Lanka and Venezuela rank globally for competitiveness of political participation score?
- Sri Lanka ranks 94th and Venezuela ranks 94th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is competitive. It ranges from unregulated political participation (score of 0), over repressed political participation (score of 1), suppressed political participation (score of 2), factional political participation (score of 3), and transitional arrangements (score of 4), to competitive political participation (score of 5).