Solomon Islands vs Trinidad and Tobago: Competitiveness of Political Participation Score
Competitiveness of Political Participation Score over time
- Solomon Islands
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 4 against 4 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.
Across all 37 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.
Solomon Islands ranks 34th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 34th of 167 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Solomon Islands | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 0 | 3.6 | 3.6 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 1990s | 3 | 4 | 1 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of political participation score, Solomon Islands or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Solomon Islands, at 4 against 4 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of political participation score between Solomon Islands and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 37 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2018.
- How do Solomon Islands and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for competitiveness of political participation score?
- Solomon Islands ranks 34th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 34th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is competitive. It ranges from unregulated political participation (score of 0), over repressed political participation (score of 1), suppressed political participation (score of 2), factional political participation (score of 3), and transitional arrangements (score of 4), to competitive political participation (score of 5).