Singapore vs Turkmenistan: Competitiveness of Political Participation Score
Singapore
2
in 2018
Turkmenistan
2
in 2018
Singapore rank
125th
Turkmenistan rank
125th
Competitiveness of Political Participation Score over time
- Singapore
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 2 against 2 in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Singapore ahead.
Singapore ranks 125th and Turkmenistan ranks 125th of 167 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Singapore | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2 | 1 | 1 | Singapore |
| 1970s | 2 | 1 | 1 | Singapore |
| 1980s | 2 | 1.2 | 0.8 | Singapore |
| 1990s | 2 | 1.1 | 0.9 | Singapore |
| 2000s | 2 | 1 | 1 | Singapore |
| 2010s | 2 | 1.67 | 0.3333 | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of political participation score, Singapore or Turkmenistan?
- Singapore, at 2 against 2 in Turkmenistan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of political participation score between Singapore and Turkmenistan?
- 0, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Turkmenistan?
- 54 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2018.
- How do Singapore and Turkmenistan rank globally for competitiveness of political participation score?
- Singapore ranks 125th and Turkmenistan ranks 125th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is competitive. It ranges from unregulated political participation (score of 0), over repressed political participation (score of 1), suppressed political participation (score of 2), factional political participation (score of 3), and transitional arrangements (score of 4), to competitive political participation (score of 5).