North Macedonia vs Suriname: Competitiveness of Political Participation Score
North Macedonia
4
in 2018
Suriname
4
in 2018
North Macedonia rank
34th
Suriname rank
34th
Competitiveness of Political Participation Score over time
- North Macedonia
- Suriname
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 4 against 4 in Suriname, a difference of 0.
Across all 44 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
North Macedonia ranks 34th and Suriname ranks 34th of 167 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1 | 3 | 2 | Suriname |
| 1980s | 1 | 2.2 | 1.2 | Suriname |
| 1990s | 3.8 | 4 | 0.2 | Suriname |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of political participation score, North Macedonia or Suriname?
- North Macedonia, at 4 against 4 in Suriname as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of political participation score between North Macedonia and Suriname?
- 0, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Suriname?
- 44 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2018.
- How do North Macedonia and Suriname rank globally for competitiveness of political participation score?
- North Macedonia ranks 34th and Suriname ranks 34th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is competitive. It ranges from unregulated political participation (score of 0), over repressed political participation (score of 1), suppressed political participation (score of 2), factional political participation (score of 3), and transitional arrangements (score of 4), to competitive political participation (score of 5).