Nicaragua vs Suriname: Competitiveness of Political Participation Score
Nicaragua
4
in 2018
Suriname
4
in 2018
Nicaragua rank
34th
Suriname rank
34th
Competitiveness of Political Participation Score over time
- Nicaragua
- Suriname
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 4 against 4 in Suriname, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Suriname ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 34th and Suriname ranks 34th of 167 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 2 | 3 | 1 | Suriname |
| 1980s | 2.6 | 2.2 | 0.4 | Nicaragua |
| 1990s | 3 | 4 | 1 | Suriname |
| 2000s | 3.3 | 4 | 0.7 | Suriname |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of political participation score, Nicaragua or Suriname?
- Nicaragua, at 4 against 4 in Suriname as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of political participation score between Nicaragua and Suriname?
- 0, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Suriname?
- 44 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2018.
- How do Nicaragua and Suriname rank globally for competitiveness of political participation score?
- Nicaragua ranks 34th and Suriname ranks 34th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is competitive. It ranges from unregulated political participation (score of 0), over repressed political participation (score of 1), suppressed political participation (score of 2), factional political participation (score of 3), and transitional arrangements (score of 4), to competitive political participation (score of 5).