Mauritius vs New Zealand: Competitiveness of Political Participation Score
Mauritius
5
in 2018
New Zealand
5
in 2018
Mauritius rank
1st
New Zealand rank
1st
Competitiveness of Political Participation Score over time
- Mauritius
- New Zealand
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 5 against 5 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.
Across all 51 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 167 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4 | 5 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1970s | 4 | 5 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1980s | 4.8 | 5 | 0.2 | New Zealand |
| 1990s | 5 | 5 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 5 | 5 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 5 | 5 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of political participation score, Mauritius or New Zealand?
- Mauritius, at 5 against 5 in New Zealand as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of political participation score between Mauritius and New Zealand?
- 0, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and New Zealand?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2018.
- How do Mauritius and New Zealand rank globally for competitiveness of political participation score?
- Mauritius ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is competitive. It ranges from unregulated political participation (score of 0), over repressed political participation (score of 1), suppressed political participation (score of 2), factional political participation (score of 3), and transitional arrangements (score of 4), to competitive political participation (score of 5).