Lithuania vs Mauritius: Competitiveness of Political Participation Score
Lithuania
5
in 2018
Mauritius
5
in 2018
Lithuania rank
1st
Mauritius rank
1st
Competitiveness of Political Participation Score over time
- Lithuania
- Mauritius
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 5 against 5 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.
Across all 51 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 1st and Mauritius ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1 | 4 | 3 | Mauritius |
| 1970s | 1 | 4 | 3 | Mauritius |
| 1980s | 1.2 | 4.8 | 3.6 | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 4.7 | 5 | 0.3 | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 5 | 5 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 5 | 5 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of political participation score, Lithuania or Mauritius?
- Lithuania, at 5 against 5 in Mauritius as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of political participation score between Lithuania and Mauritius?
- 0, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Mauritius?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2018.
- How do Lithuania and Mauritius rank globally for competitiveness of political participation score?
- Lithuania ranks 1st and Mauritius ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is competitive. It ranges from unregulated political participation (score of 0), over repressed political participation (score of 1), suppressed political participation (score of 2), factional political participation (score of 3), and transitional arrangements (score of 4), to competitive political participation (score of 5).