Lesotho vs South Africa: Competitiveness of Political Participation Score
Competitiveness of Political Participation Score over time
- Lesotho
- South Africa
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 4 against 4 in South Africa, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 51 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Lesotho ahead.
Lesotho ranks 34th and South Africa ranks 34th of 167 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3 | 2 | 1 | Lesotho |
| 1970s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1.6 | 2 | 0.4 | South Africa |
| 1990s | 2.88 | 3.5 | 0.625 | South Africa |
| 2000s | 3.5 | 4 | 0.5 | South Africa |
| 2010s | 3.78 | 4 | 0.2222 | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of political participation score, Lesotho or South Africa?
- Lesotho, at 4 against 4 in South Africa as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of political participation score between Lesotho and South Africa?
- 0, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and South Africa?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2018.
- How do Lesotho and South Africa rank globally for competitiveness of political participation score?
- Lesotho ranks 34th and South Africa ranks 34th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is competitive. It ranges from unregulated political participation (score of 0), over repressed political participation (score of 1), suppressed political participation (score of 2), factional political participation (score of 3), and transitional arrangements (score of 4), to competitive political participation (score of 5).