Laos vs Uzbekistan: Competitiveness of Political Participation Score
Laos
1
in 2018
Uzbekistan
1
in 2018
Laos rank
149th
Uzbekistan rank
149th
Competitiveness of Political Participation Score over time
- Laos
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Laos currently reports 1 against 1 in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1953 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Laos ranks 149th and Uzbekistan ranks 149th of 167 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Laos averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 3 | 1 | 2 | Laos |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1.2 | 0.2 | Uzbekistan |
| 1990s | 1 | 1.1 | 0.1 | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of political participation score, Laos or Uzbekistan?
- Laos, at 1 against 1 in Uzbekistan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of political participation score between Laos and Uzbekistan?
- 0, with Laos ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Uzbekistan?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1953 to 2018.
- How do Laos and Uzbekistan rank globally for competitiveness of political participation score?
- Laos ranks 149th and Uzbekistan ranks 149th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is competitive. It ranges from unregulated political participation (score of 0), over repressed political participation (score of 1), suppressed political participation (score of 2), factional political participation (score of 3), and transitional arrangements (score of 4), to competitive political participation (score of 5).