Kyrgyzstan vs Sri Lanka: Competitiveness of Political Participation Score
Competitiveness of Political Participation Score over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 3 against 3 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 70 shared years of data; in 1948 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 94th and Sri Lanka ranks 94th of 167 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 3 and Sri Lanka in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1950s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1960s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 1970s | 1 | 3 | 2 | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | 1.2 | 3 | 1.8 | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 2 | 3 | 1 | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 1 | 3.3 | 2.3 | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of political participation score, Kyrgyzstan or Sri Lanka?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 3 against 3 in Sri Lanka as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of political participation score between Kyrgyzstan and Sri Lanka?
- 0, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Sri Lanka?
- 70 years are reported by both, from 1948 to 2018.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Sri Lanka rank globally for competitiveness of political participation score?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 94th and Sri Lanka ranks 94th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is competitive. It ranges from unregulated political participation (score of 0), over repressed political participation (score of 1), suppressed political participation (score of 2), factional political participation (score of 3), and transitional arrangements (score of 4), to competitive political participation (score of 5).