Israel vs Kyrgyzstan: Competitiveness of Political Participation Score
Israel
3
in 2018
Kyrgyzstan
3
in 2018
Israel rank
94th
Kyrgyzstan rank
94th
Competitiveness of Political Participation Score over time
- Israel
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Israel currently reports 3 against 3 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 70 shared years of data; in 1948 it was Israel ahead.
Israel ranks 94th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 94th of 167 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 5 | 1 | 4 | Israel |
| 1950s | 5 | 1 | 4 | Israel |
| 1960s | 4.7 | 1 | 3.7 | Israel |
| 1970s | 4 | 1 | 3 | Israel |
| 1980s | 3.1 | 1.2 | 1.9 | Israel |
| 1990s | 3 | 2 | 1 | Israel |
| 2000s | 3 | 1 | 2 | Israel |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of political participation score, Israel or Kyrgyzstan?
- Israel, at 3 against 3 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of political participation score between Israel and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Kyrgyzstan?
- 70 years are reported by both, from 1948 to 2018.
- How do Israel and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for competitiveness of political participation score?
- Israel ranks 94th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 94th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is competitive. It ranges from unregulated political participation (score of 0), over repressed political participation (score of 1), suppressed political participation (score of 2), factional political participation (score of 3), and transitional arrangements (score of 4), to competitive political participation (score of 5).