Iraq vs Tajikistan: Competitiveness of Political Participation Score
Iraq
3
in 2018
Tajikistan
3
in 2018
Iraq rank
94th
Tajikistan rank
94th
Competitiveness of Political Participation Score over time
- Iraq
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 3 against 3 in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 88 shared years of data; in 1924 it was Iraq ahead.
Iraq ranks 94th and Tajikistan ranks 94th of 167 countries.
Across the 10 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 5 and Tajikistan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 3 | 1 | 2 | Iraq |
| 1930s | 3 | 1 | 2 | Iraq |
| 1940s | 3 | 1 | 2 | Iraq |
| 1950s | 2.8 | 1 | 1.8 | Iraq |
| 1960s | 1.8 | 1 | 0.8 | Iraq |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1.2 | 0.2 | Tajikistan |
| 1990s | 1 | 2.3 | 1.3 | Tajikistan |
| 2000s | 1 | 3 | 2 | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of political participation score, Iraq or Tajikistan?
- Iraq, at 3 against 3 in Tajikistan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of political participation score between Iraq and Tajikistan?
- 0, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Tajikistan?
- 88 years are reported by both, from 1924 to 2018.
- How do Iraq and Tajikistan rank globally for competitiveness of political participation score?
- Iraq ranks 94th and Tajikistan ranks 94th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Political Participation Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which political participation is competitive. It ranges from unregulated political participation (score of 0), over repressed political participation (score of 1), suppressed political participation (score of 2), factional political participation (score of 3), and transitional arrangements (score of 4), to competitive political participation (score of 5).